Virgin Australia refutes the claims of Qantas on Cathay codeshare

This post was originally published on this site

Virgin Australia opposes Qantas’ s proposed codeshare with Cathay Pacific. (Rob Finlayson)

Virgin Australia has described Qantas’ s argument that its proposed codeshare with Cathay Pacific would not reduce competition in the Australia-Hong Kong market as simplistic and incorrect.

Qantas is seeking approval from Australia’ s International Air Services Commission (IASC) {to have|to get|to possess} Cathay Pacific add its CX airline code 35 Qantas-operated flights a week from Brisbane, Melbourne and Sydney to Hong Kong.

The Flying Kangaroo  has argued the focus of the codeshare is on attracting connecting passengers, with the codeshare flights to be sold only {as part of|included in|within} a through journey involving connections either beyond {Hong Kong|Hk} on Cathay Pacific to destinations in India, {Sri Lanka|Ceylon (veraltet)} and Vietnam, among other countries, or to other Australian domestic destinations from Brisbane, Melbourne and Sydney on Qantas.

The proposed codeshare has been opposed by Virgin Australia , which said in its latest submission {to the|towards the|for the} IASC it firmly rejected Qantas’ s assertion {there would be|there is} no adverse impact on the competitive dynamics on point-to-point routes between Australia and Hong Kong.

“ This simplistic view is incorrect and glosses {over the|on the|within the} complexities of route profitability, ” the Virgin Australia submission dated March 28 and published on the IASC website said.

Virgin Australia argued {that all|that|that every} airlines carried a mix of passengers on their Australia-Hong Kong services comprising local point-to-point passengers, connecting passengers from either Australian domestic or international points heading to Hong Kong, passengers travelling beyond Hong Kong on connecting flights, and finally passengers with connecting flights at both ends of the route.

As such, Virgin Australia said it was logical to expect that approval of Qantas’ s application would lead to an increase in the volume of connecting traffic, due to Cathay Pacific being able to sell Qantas-operated flights under the codeshare agreement. This would lead to higher passenger load factors for Qantas’ s flights between Australia and Hong Kong.

“ With this increased load, Qantas will have a greater {ability to|capability to|capacity to} adopt different strategies on pricing and inventory management in both the local point-to-point markets, as well as behind connections on domestic Australian routes, ” Virgin Australia said.

“ To suggest otherwise would be completely {contrary to|unlike|as opposed to} established revenue management practices.

“ The exclusion of point-to-point itineraries from Qantas’ application {does not|will not|would not} alter the fact that it still encompasses a code share on overlapping routes. This entails potentially significant detrimental impacts on competition. ”

Qantas had told the IASC in a previous submission an average of 27 {per cent|%|percent} of its passengers flying from Brisbane, Melbourne and Sydney to Hong Kong, or {vice versa|the other way round}, were connecting passengers. Further, Qantas submission said the figure for Virgin Australia was, on average, 21 {per cent|%|percent}. A number for Cathay Pacific was not provided.

“ The competitive dynamics on the point to point routes will be unchanged by the proposed variation, ” Qantas said.

Virgin Australia said the IASC {would need to|will have to|will need to} determine if the “ extremely limited public benefits” {associated with the|linked to the} proposed codeshare outweighed the “ corresponding potential detriment to competition, tourism and trade”.

“ From a practical perspective, Virgin Australia would encourage the Commission to consider whether a reasonable member of the travelling public, or an Australian exporter, would be willing to risk the Hong Kong route returning to {a market|an industry} dominated by two carriers in a duopoly, in exchange for gaining the ability to access marginal improvements in flight connection times and increased frequent flyer points, ” Virgin Australia said.

“ It is also important to note that {the majority of|nearly all|virtually all} passengers travelling on the {Hong Kong|Hk} route are travelling on point-to-point itineraries and it is therefore logical to expect that these travellers would consider that the {benefits of|advantages of|great things about} robust competition from three or more carriers, in terms of lower airfares and increased service options, are more valuable {than the|compared to|compared to the} claimed benefits of Qantas’ proposal. ”

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has also raised concerns about the proposed Cathay Pacific and Qantas codeshare, with its submission to the IASC saying “ the conduct may soften competition {in the|within the|inside the} Australia-Hong Kong air passengers services market”.

Qantas also planned {to add|to include|to incorporate} its QF airline code on 35 Cathay Pacific-operated flights a week from the same three Australian cities and Hong Kong.

{While this|Could} did not require regulatory approval, Qantas has said previously “ it should not be assumed” {that the|that this|the} airline would still be able to codeshare on Cathay Pacific’ s Australia-Hong Kong services {should the|if the} IASC reject its application.

Instead, {the ability|the capability|the power} for Qantas to codeshare on Cathay Pacific’ s flights to Hong Kong from Brisbane, Melbourne and Sydney would be “ placed {at risk|in danger|vulnerable} and subject to further discussions between the carriers”.

A pair of Airbus A330s from Cathay Pacific and Qantas at Sydney Airport. (Rob Finlayson)

A pair of Airbus A330s from Cathay Pacific and Qantas at Sydney Airport. (Rob Finlayson)

Cathay Pacific, Qantas and Virgin Australia the only three airlines with nonstop Australia-Hong Kong {flights|plane tickets|routes}

Currently, Cathay Pacific serves six destinations in Australia – Adelaide, Brisbane, Cairns, Melbourne, Perth and Sydney – from its {Hong Kong|Hk} hub with a mix of Airbus A330-300s, A350-900s and Boeing 777-300ERs offering business, premium economy and economy. {This does not|That is not} include freighter services.

It is the only Hong Kong-based carrier offering nonstop flights to Australia, after Virgin Australia alliance partner Hong Kong Airlines withdrew its flights to Cairns {and the|as well as the|plus the} Gold Coast in October 2018.

Qantas offers nonstop flights from Brisbane, Melbourne and Sydney to Hong Kong with {a mix of|a mixture of|a blend} Airbus A330s, A380s and Boeing 747s and 787-9s .

Virgin Australia started serving the Special Administrative Region (SAR) with its own aircraft in July 2017, when it began nonstop flights on the Melbourne-Hong Kong route with two-class Airbus A330-200s featuring 20 business class seats in a 1-2-1 configuration with direct aisle access for each passenger and 255 economy class seats at eight abreast.

It added daily Sydney-Hong Kong services , again with A330-200 equipment, in July 2018.

Virgin Australia Airbus A330-200 VH-XFD operating the inaugural VA87 from Melbourne to Hong Kong on July 5 2017. (Virgin Australia)

Virgin Australia Airbus A330-200 VH-XFD operating the inaugural VA87 from Melbourne to Hong Kong on July 5 2017. (Virgin Australia)